![]() |
|
HomeworkMCB 419 Homework 2 (Spring 2009)Orienting strategies - orthokinesis and klinokinesisThis assignment has two parts. In part I, you will explore a pre-written simulation (Sowbug Demo) that illustrates the principle of orthokinesis. You do not have to write any NetLogo code for this part of the assignment, just run the simlation and answer the questions in the 'Assignment' section. For the second part of the assignment, you will write your own code to implement a form of bacterial "chemotaxis". More accurately this is a form of "adaptive klinokinesis." A demo version is found on the 'Ecoli Demo' tab; specific guidelines for writing your simulation can be found on the 'Ecoli Specs' tab. Answer the questions found on the 'Assignment' tab and email your responses along with a copy of your E. coli simulation file to mcb419@gmail.com with 'hw02' in the Subject line. Here is a NetLogo file that you can download to help get you started on the E. coli simulation: hw02_template.nlogo This assignment is due by 11:59PM (midnight) on Tue, Feb 3. Download the source code here: hw02_sowbugs.nlogo Specific Design Requirements/Guidelinesbuilding the user interface
button functionality
bot behavior
AssignmentYou can access a copy of the assignment file HERE, or copy and paste from the text below.
=================================================================
MCB 419 Homework 2 (Spring 2009)
When you've finished answering all the questions, email a copy
of this file (hw02.txt) with your responses as PLAIN TEXT in
the main body of the email message, and attach a copy of your
Netlogo simulation file (e.g. hw02.nlogo).
Email to mcb419@gmail.com with 'hw02' in the Subject line.
=================================================================
Part I: Sowbug Demo (hw2_sowbug.nlogo)
1. In the sowbug demo with default parameters
(speed-on-grass = 1.0, speed-under-board = 0.02),
about how many ticks does it take for at least
80% (8/10) of the bugs to end up under the board?
2. For those bugs that are underneath the board at
that point in time, do they tend to be clustered
near the edges or near the center of the board? Why?
(hint: use the "show-bugs-under-board?" switch)
3. a) Set the slider values to:
speed-on-grass = 1.0, speed-under-board = 1.0.
Reset and run the simulation for about 1000 ticks.
On average, about how many bugs are under the
board at any given time?
b) Now set:
speed-on-grass = 1.0, speed-under-board = 0.3.
Continue running for another 1000 ticks.
What changes?
c) Now set:
speed-on-grass = 1.0, speed-under-board = 0.0.
Run for another 1000 ticks. What changes?
4. If real sowbugs used this particular strategy, what
might be the disadvantage, from a survival perspective,
of having "speed-under-board" equal to zero (i.e.,
stop moving completely)?
5. a) Look at the NetLogo code in hw2_sowbug.nlogo.
What property of the SIMULATED environment are the
simulated sowbugs using to modify their response?
b) In the REAL WORLD, what sensing modalities would
most likely be involved in detecting a suitable
environment under the wood plank?
Part II: Bacterial "chemotaxis" (adaptive klinokinesis)
6. About how many ticks are required for the mean
concentration experienced by the bots to reach 90%
of maximum? Do you think this is faster or slower
than could be accomplished using an orthokinesis
strategy (like the sowbugs)? Why?
7. Modify your code to create a "noisy" Gaussian bump.
Specifically, during setup, have each patch multiply
its "pconc" value by a random number between 0 and 1
relative to the original (smooth Gaussian) value.
Rerun the simulation and describe the behavior. What
implications does this result have for E. coli in the
real world?
8. The paper by Jurica and Stoddard summarizes the molecular
signaling network for bacterial chemotaxis. The paper by
Dusenbery summarizes the sorts of challenges that microbes
face in their natural environment. In your own words, define
the "problem" for which the chemotaxis signaling network is
the "solution." Try to be as specific as possible in your
problem definition (e.g., "finding food" is too vague).
Imagine, for example, that you're specifying the "problem"
for an engineer who has to come up with a solution for
controlling a nano-robot to perform the task. What would
the engineer need to know about the "problem"?
=================================================================
END OF THE ASSIGNMENT
=================================================================
SolutionThis is just one possible solution. You can download the full NetLogo file (hw02_solution.nlogo), or just look at the code below. |